PDA

View Full Version : Letter to the industry


dannefaerd
22-12-2006, 13:33
Saw a great article on 68 Caliber (www.68caliber.com) ... the original can be found here (http://www.68caliber.com/story042086.php). I've reproduced it below .... makes for some interesting reading.


An Open Letter to the Paintball Industry

Now that the Angelo Gordon & Co. purchase and re-organization of PMI and NPS is well underway, I believe that it is time, once again, to make an appeal to the industry to get its act together.

This letter is for everyone, but is primarily directed at Angelo, Gordon & Company, Imperial Capital Corporation, K2 and Summit Partners, the new 'top tier' of our industry ? companies owned and operated by individuals who believe that paintball is worth the investment of hundreds of millions of dollars.

In and of itself, that is quite a statement. This little corner of the extreme sports market, a game that each of us spends a few hundred to a few thousand dollars on every year is believed to be worth HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS by people who know money. Perhaps even more significant is the fact that not only do those people think its worth investing in, but they believe it is going to grow by a large enough margin to not only cover their investments but pay them handsome profits along the way.

Twenty-three years ago, as I built my first home-made stickfeeder, and others like me all across the country brought their own fledgling ideas into existence, we dreamed of something like this happening, but none of us could have possibly dreamed this big.

The question now of course is, where are we going to go? Is the collective dream of paintball greatness going to finally have a chance to be realized, or are the new leaders going to continue in the same old direction we have been going for the past 12 years?

I define the 'same old direction' as the failed policies of political divisiveness, the quest for market domination at all costs, the blurring of the traditional lines of business, the undercutting of the specialty retail base, the promotion of a negatively oriented youth culture, the partisan perversion of neutral service organizations, the lack of a unified governing body and the complete and utter absence of a robust and effective industry organization.

I do not accuse any of the aforementioned companies of being responsible for this situation. Instead I suggest that there now exists the industry?s best chance to achieve its common goals of success, stability and growth, simply because all of these companies understand - probably better than anyone else in paintball - that their collective best chance for success lies in a healthy and unified industry.

Never before in our past twenty-five years has so much knowledge of industry and so much potential wealth been brought together in one place at the same time. It seems to me that these four companies actually have more in common than they do differences. None of them come from within a paintball tradition; all have proven in the real world that they understand money, and investments, markets and industry.

The broad history of successful industry illustrates that open markets, fair and level competitive fields and long-range vision lead to growth and success, while monopolies, restricted markets, political favoritism and short-term thinking ultimately lead to failure.

Surely the new captains of this industry understand this basic equation. Surely they know that money spent on growth is better spent than money used for dismemberment and destruction. They must understand this or they would not be where they are today.

Do not think that I am advocating some kind of paintball socialism. I don't believe for one second that the owners and shareholders of these companies are going to become best friends and share milk and cookies. I fully expect that they will put the well-being of their own interests ahead of their competitors and ahead of the industry if it should come to that.

What I am suggesting is that by virtue of their origin - all of them from outside of the paintball community, obviously sharing many of the same values, methods and visions - they are better placed to discover and develop the common goals and needs of a truly mature and potentially wildly successful industry.

We are in a new era of paintball and these four companies have the best chance of anyone of indelibly marking it as their own for the rest of time.

What needs to be done? Only a few seemingly simple things, things that many other industries have done before, things that these four companies have no doubt already done many times over in their other endeavors. Things that have eluded our industry for a quarter of a century.
Re-establish the traditional lines of business that have served human economy well for the past ten thousand years: Let manufacturers manufacture and give them a place to sell at a sustainable margin. Let distributors buy in volume and sell smaller quantities at a reasonable market. Let retailers service the customers and make a decent dollar so they can survive and keep the pipeline open.
Figure out a way to help the big box stores work in harmony with the traditional retailers - you need them both, the one for volume and growth, the other for longevity and maintenance.
Stop competing on price/loss-leaders alone. This has only served to decrease the available dollars for everyone. Compete on service. Compete on support. Compete on innovation. Start taking a profit so that everyone else can also. Retailers with more money will purchase more product from everyone.
Ignore the temptation to take political advantage of organizations that by any measure should be non-partisan. ASTM and PEC are both tremendously valuable commodities for the industry - indirectly reducing liability exposure, manufacturing costs through shared standards and allowing paintball to take advantage of the developments of other industries without sharing in the expense. Sadly, over the years many other service and standards organizations within the industry have fallen to political mishandling. Identify those organizations that can only do their work effectively by remaining industry-neutral, support them, establish a believable, shared hands-off policy and work towards creating other, similar organizations where they are needed.
Help bring sensibility to the 'sponsorship-as-marketing-tool' idiocy. Today, practically every second-day player expects a handout due to the rampant profligacy of ill-considered "sponsorship". Bring sponsorship policies into line with their purpose - the ability to directly increase sales and exposure. Recognize that in most cases support of events is potentially more effective than support of individual teams. Sponsorship in many, if not most cases, only serves to reduce the market value of product by injecting a zero cost element into the market. Most competitors cannot share a team. Most competitors can share an event.
Address the culture. Once again, promote fair play, honesty and responsibility. Place a premium on sportsmanship. Demand that those you support strive to maintain the highest of ideals. Publicly reward good behavior and punish bad behavior. Take a stand against unsafe backyard play and paintball vandalism. Publicly demonstrate the ways in which you would like to see your investment portrayed in the media.
Get a handle on intellectual property. It's senseless and wasteful for an industry to be beating up its own over intangible property that they could be licensing outside the industry for everyone's benefit. Several other industries have amply demonstrated the effectiveness of patent consortiums - and those industries generally have a lot more at stake with their IP than paintball does.
Establish a temporary organization whose goal is to bring into being a governing body for competitive events. Do so in a manner that embraces all of the existing formats, leagues, and classifications. Do so in a manner that envisions future growth, future investment and the participation of external elements. Do so inclusively rather than exclusively. Help build a sport that will help you sell more product to an ever-growing base of consumers.
Collectively fund an outside firm that specializes in industry organizations. Make a place at the table for all of the market segments - manufacturers, distributors, big retailers, specialty retailers, field owners, event producers, the recreational, scenario and tournament people, the media, the service organizations, the charities the non-profits and yourselves. Identify the areas of common concern and focus on them - industry image, industry promotion and growth, safety and external competitors to name the obvious ones - and work towards creating shared policies for dealing effectively with them. Remember to embrace inclusivity and reject exclusivity.
While the need for the previously mentioned changes and improvements to our industry have been recognized for at least 23 of the past 25 years, and despite the fact that many notable attempts at achieving one or more of them have failed during that period of time, and even despite the fact that it is easier to state what is needed than it is to formulate the achievement of those goals, they remain not only possible but necessary.

I have no doubt that the vast majority of consumers who support this industry with their dollars also support the above-mentioned goals. Many even recognize that they might have to pay a price - be it personal or economic - in order to see them come to fruition and I remain convinced that they would be more than willing to accept that price if it meant they would then be able to enjoy the benefits of a mature and sensible industry in which everyone knows the rules and most everyone follows them on a daily basis.


Word.

Vijil
22-12-2006, 15:06
I'm down with that.

Burnt Toast
23-12-2006, 10:07
Ha, good luck with that.

Unfortunatly, it's never about making friends, it's always about making money.

Vijil
23-12-2006, 11:43
I guess the point is that the best way to make money is to make the industry grow really big - and the best way to do that is to cooperate some at least initially.

Burnt Toast
23-12-2006, 17:18
I'd agree with you Vij if I thought Angelo Gordon & Co was actually interested in paintball.
They are an investment company who buy company's that are about to close up.
Sure they will try to build it back up, but they will do that by running the company differently from within.
They see oppertunaty in A poorly run company, buy it, turn it around, and sell it.

At least this is the impression I got from reading the info on there web site.

MikeE
01-02-2007, 22:43
As I'm not playing anymore.. I can be a lil controversial (like thats stopped me)

Thursday, February 01, 2007
The sad state of New Zealand Paintball.

2007 for me is my 10th year of involvement with paintball in New Zealand - with it all starting out at Commando One for a friends 13th birthday party back in 1997. Since then I've some great things happen to the sport, and some really bad things, like the lack of sustained growth in the sporting side.

This is strange, as there are massive amounts of (entry level) paintball markers being sold in New Zealand, and fields like Actions in west auckland see hundreds of people play ball every weekend (be it rental or recreational games). So what is preventing New Zealand paintball from growing into a legitimate sport? Why is it that Malaysia (where paintball began in 2004, the year I visited and refereed their first international tournament) has had stunning growth and we have had decline?

The first issue would be demographics, we simply have a small population - that said, 1 million people in Auckland should be more than enough to sustain a few decent teams. But we do lack the critical mass of people, and there is a massive amount of fields in comparison to those who play.

Second would be organisation. New Zealand lacks a real organisation to lead the sport into the future. It has the NZPPA, which unfortuanately is not independent of a couple of certain fields and is not respected by the playing population at large. If paintball is to grow in New Zealand, it needs an organisation that can provide a set of rules, as similar as possible to overseas standards as New Zealand law requires. The organisation needs to work to actively promote the sport and a proper tournament series.

Team hopping is another issue, along with sandbagging of players in teams. The lack of a clear organisation and player database allows teamhopping and the stacking of teams between tournaments which means that often teams dissapear overnight, or a "new" team is created which is really another team in drag. There is no easy way to make a distinction between the experianced and top teams, and the fresh teams when you see them on paper.

Which leads to the next issue. The lack of a novice of "handicapped" division that feeds into the "pro/am" division. There needs to be something to bridge the gap between the rental player, the recreational player and the tournament player who spends hundreds of dollars a month on shooting paint. For the average player the idea of paying $500 plus for a weekend of getting shot to shit by players with 5 to 10 times more experiance than them is not particularily popular. Hence the lack of new blood in New Zealand paintball.

The final two issues would be legal issues and personalities. We have the bottle problem thanks to some nice socialist people at Erma, who think that international ATSM and DOT standards are worthless and expect us to retest every bottle that comes into the country at the cost of thousands for something that is in reality only worth $300 and has a limited market. This greatly reduces competition and is an artificial barrier to entry created by the government. There is no incentive to legalise more bottles at your own expense as any other competitor can free ride off your investment. Then there is the ambigious parts of the Arms Act. The 1983 Arms act quite clearly states that there are exemptions for "stock markers" which is what the early paintball markers are. But the police treat all paintball markers as airguns, and the stock marker expemption has never need tested in the court of law with a competant lawyer. This creates all sorts of restrictions on ownership, importation, resale, firing modes and ages of play, which again hurts the playerbase with no increase to the "public good" in terms of safety. (face it someone is more likely to commit a crime with a $100 pump action off trade me than a $2500 paintmarker with multiple firing modes in from the USA). Regulation on paintball simply achieves nothing for the public, but hurts the legitimate sport.

Finally is some of the cancerous personalities in paintball. They are simply forcing people to leave. Why play or referee if you are going to be abused by a team who thinks its ok to cheat or threaten a player, or slander them off the field. I know thats why I stopped playing competativlely, as did many other well known figures in the NZ paintball scene. There are too many adults acting like children.

So for paintball to grow in New Zealand it needs:
a) consistant marketing and a well run web community (not the terrible paintball.co.nz website)
b) a proper body to represent it legally, on the news, to draft rules and to track players and teams
c) a feeder division at major tournaments to introduce new players to the sport in a manner that won't see them gunned down off the break
d) the legal issues sorted out once and for all. This will never happen with the current government and its attitudes to firearms owners
e) certain personalities to tone it down or leave the sport.
f) field ops or players to create grass roots local tournaments (i.e. 3 man) with prizes to get new blood interested

Once these happen we might see the return of grass roots paintball, and increase in numbers and maybe a reason for international teams to come across again. Untill this happens we will just see a steady decline of players and the rec scene increase.

http://mikeenz.blogspot.com/2007/02/sad-state-of-new-zealand-paintball.html

brin_vg
02-02-2007, 08:51
For the average player the idea of paying $500 plus for a weekend of getting shot to shit by players with 5 to 10 times more experiance than them is not particularily popular. Hence the lack of new blood in New Zealand paintball.


So true. Thats the whole reason my team pulled out of the wellington easter 5 man, it's just too damn expensive (we're all under 16 and jobless :( ). We'd have to find $1000 for entry and paint, then get completely nailed. Even if hell freezes over, the flying pig savages all the other teams, and we win, we'd just get a nice little trophy. Im not criticizing any of the organisers, as Im sure it's bloody difficult putting something like this together. Im just saying the incentive isn't there for new players.

Vijil
02-02-2007, 08:57
I think the idea of running a three man hopperball tourney like the Hawkes Bay Triples kindof thing sounds like a good one if we're looking for new players.

Shane396
02-02-2007, 11:02
Agreed, a 3-man would be affordable for everyone, easy to set-up (you could run it at TAG or something) And how much easier it would be to organise a 3-man team!

ANTSMAN68
02-02-2007, 13:26
"I think the idea of running a three man hopperball tourney like the Hawkes Bay Triples kindof thing sounds like a good one if we're looking for new players."

sounds like your volunteering Robert?

isnt Martin doing something like that? or the sawdust inn?

Vijil
02-02-2007, 14:11
Not sure anymore, so many things seem to come and go...

Might think about it.

Burnt Toast
02-02-2007, 14:38
Hay hang on a minute Ants, your getting ahead of yourself.
we haven't talked about it nearly enought just yet ha ha ha.

Shane396
02-02-2007, 15:27
Well me who would be intrested in a wellington 3-man tournament? (I can ask that and not be automaticaly nominated to organise it 'cause no-one would trust a 14yo to do that!!)((Not saying i wouldn't though))

brin_vg
02-02-2007, 20:17
Definitely. Could even make it a monthly thing if it was held somewhere like TAG or the sawdust inn. It'd be so much easier just sorting 3 people for a team, as you should know shane... I'm sure wayne would be interested